TO: THE COUNCIL OF ELDERS
FROM: Larry Salyer
November 13, 1998
This is to notify all of you that due to severe conscience problems I did not
go to
Michigan to investigate complaints against Dave Pack. This decision was based
on five
factors as follows:
1) After careful review of the Council proceedings, chaired by Dr. Meredith,
in which Dave
Pack was temporarily suspended from the Council, it is very clear that the
judgment was
predetermined, and one-sided evidence was hastily solicited to support that
judgment. This
is contrary to clear Biblical principles found in Proverbs 18:13, and
elsewhere.
As our legal counsel pointed out during the meeting, malicious words were used
throughout
the hearing to condemn the accused. I strenuously object to this. It was only
after a
motion to remove Dave from the Council was defeated, that an investigation was
authorized
as a last resort.
2) I, the Director of Church Administration, though having responded to the
initial
complaint, was completely circumvented in dealing with the local pastor and
the regional
pastor, strongly implying that I was involved in some conspiracy and also
"suspect." This makes it impossible for me to ascertain the true
facts from the
witnesses.
3) During the Council meeting, I repeatedly requested, in fact eventually
demanded, that
the parties already involved in investigating events in Michigan reveal to me
their
identity and the action taken. I was never given an answer, leading me to
conclude that I
was vulnerable to false accusations.
4) In the meantime, reports were received which give a totally opposite
picture of the
events in question. This again implies that the "evidence" received
was
solicited for the purpose of condemning the accused.
5) At the conclusion of the Council meeting, we were encouraged to make a
"fresh
start," putting our differences behind, but certain members were
unwilling to give
Dave Pack that same opportunity, even though that was requested by
several.
Please understand that even though I was trying to cooperate at the time the
meeting
ended, it became increasingly obvious, upon reflection, that my conscience
would not allow
me to participate in this investigation.
Mr. George Meeker informed me that due to personal conscience problems, he
also declined
to go to Michigan at this time. I have communicated our decision to Mr. Greer
and advised
Mr. Greer not to attempt to conduct an investigation on his own, especially
since he has
already submitted a negative report which could prejudice his conclusions.
In my judgment, it is necessary for the Council to reconsider this whole
matter in a calm
and objective, and might I say Christian, manner. Justice demands that Mr.
Pack be granted
the same "fresh start" that others seek, and not allowing this
undermines the
whole concept.
Larry R. Salyer
c. Norbert Link