CONTRADICTIONS IN RCM STATEMENTS This is not an exhaustive study of all the information that is currently
floating around, but rather contradictory statements that I think need to be
made plain for all to see. These statements and quotes that you will read are
not under dispute. They are not heresay. They are in the very words of Dr.
Meredith. As he himself said in his Dec. 21st letter, "Please read my
answers carefully..."
1. Was the Board trying to "oust" Dr. Meredith or get him to stay?
RCM
Nov. 27th letter:
"After I rejected a few very unsatisfactory offers they made to get me
to stay, they FIRED me as the President and Chairman of the Board! These
men who I had brought in to help were finally able to oust
me."
2. Had RCM started another organization or hadnt he?
RCM
Nov. 21st letter:
"We have already started to
incorporate and will see to it as soon as possible that your donations can
be deducted from your taxable income as usual."
RCM
Dec. 21st letter:
"Still later, they tried to give the impression that I had already
started a competing church when I came into that final Tuesday Board meeting [Nov. 24th]. This
is absolutely untrue! I did NOT have a competing
Church....
"I [had] told them that I was going to talk it over with my advisors, that I would not start another church over the weekend, and that I would do what I have to do!"
3. Did RCM claim to be "Gods Anointed" or not?
RCM Nov. 27th letter:
"At the beginning of Global, as you know, I was the founder and Presiding
Evangelist. The Living Christ used me to get the whole thing
started...."
RCM Nov. 21st letter:
Describing himself: "...the one Christ guided to raise up and lead the
Global Church of God.... the one Christ has used to raise up and lead the
Global Church of God."
"Frankly, brethren, throughout the Bible, whenever you see a man being used of Godwhether by appointment or through circumstancesto raise up or lead a phase of Gods Work, that man is Gods anointed..."
RCM Dec. 21st letter:
"...they keep indicating that I think of myself as "God's
anointed" (as though I am some "pope" or "king").
I'm sure that they know in their heart that I have NEVER tried to
appropriate unto myself any such title!"
"Certainly, anyone called of God to raise up a branch or era of God's Church is "anointed" of God if he has, indeed, been called to do this and is led by God's Spirit in doing it.... Was I not then guided by God's Spirit to do this?"
4. Did RCM have a majority of the Council behind him or was he "outvoted"?
RCM Nov. 21st letter:
"The majority of the Council of Elders backs my leadership"
RCM Nov. 27th letter:
"I should point out here that at that point the MAJORITY of the Council
of Elders supported menot these men on the Board. NO WONDER they wanted
to by-pass the Council of Elders! Among the members of the Council of Elders
who supported my leadership are Messrs. Carl McNair, Charles Bryce, John Ogwyn
and Dick Ames."
RCM Nov. 21st letter:
"Frankly, brethren, since I was "out voted" anyway, I tried for
a while to cooperate and go along with this system for the sake of UNITY in
Gods Church."
[My note: Don Haney says that RCM was talking about being "out voted" on the the Board and not the Council of Elders. But if you read RCMs letters closely, you will see that RCM is speaking in the context of the issue of Government. THAT issue was only decided by the Council of Elders -- NEVER the Board. Notice in the above quote when RCM says, "this system." He is referring to the government structure the Council was voting on.]
5. Had there been unity or a growing coup attempt over the last year or two?
RCM Nov. 21st letter:
"As I resisted this, they became more and more presumptuous over the
last year. Threats and insinuations made it obvious that if I did not
"go along" with them that they would try to remove me from the Board
or Council.... [These men] had a great deal of personal ambition and a
completely different view of how we should conduct the Work of God. So trouble
began to brew. For over the last year or two, some of these men have
tried to push me into going off completely off WGN...."
The Journal ("RCM says no takeover in offing") - Aug. 31,
1998
Concerning Tulsa sermon (only 3 months earlier!)
"No one is attempting to wrest control of the Global Church of God from
presiding evangelist and founder Roderick C. Meredith. So said Dr. Meredith
the Sabbath of Aug 1 to 157 people, mostly Global members, while here during a
speaking tour of several states.
"Dr. Meredith, 68, reassured the brethren of the Tulsa congregation that rumors of a palace coup were unfounded, that he and he alone is in charge, even though Global officials (with his blessing) recently met and reaffirmed their support of a church governance system that includes a board of directors and council of elders.
"Dr. Meredith, during his announcements before his sermon, said he had heard that many Global members were doubting everything, although he could understand an attitude of healthy skepticism because he is originally from Missouri, the Show Me State.
"But liars dont enter the Kingdom of God, he said, and hes not lying when he says that no conspiracy to remove him is afoot and that rumors people are spreading to that effect are silly.
"Again affirming that no one was trying to force him out of his ecclesiastical responsibilites, he asked: Who does the program? I do. Who writes most of the lead articles? I do. Who writes the coworker letters? I do. Is the board or council suggesting anything else? No. No one has hinted of such a thing, even in the last couple or three months since weve had all these discussions. Weve been in total harmony.
"But some are criticizing, theyre going around upsetting people, and theyre talking about various conspiracy theories. Some have said, I understand, that the men at San Diego have already put me out and I just dont know it yet. Well, no one else there knows it, either. I can guarantee that."
"So if theyre trying to pull some dirty trick or get rid of me -- but dont think Im hinting that they might be because as far as I know theyre not, and I love them, and I dont think they are at all."
[My note: Dr. Meredith made many public statements over the past year about how unified Globals Headquarters and leading ministry werenot only at the 1998 Feast of Tabernacles at which I was presentbut also in his last Global sermon!]
6. Is what happened similar to Korahs rebellion or not?
RCM
Dec. 28th letter:
"Brethren, please read Numbers 16 very carefully. The number of parallels
with our present situation is indeed striking. Back then, it was not just
three men on the Board--joined later by a fourth. Rather, that rebellion
involved 250 men of renown who were jealous of Moses and his
office. Notice what they said to Moses and Aaron, You take too much upon
yourselves, for all the congregation is holy, every one of them, and the Lord
is among them. Why then do you exalt yourselves above the congregation of the
Lord? (Numb.16:3)."
RCM - When Should You Follow Church
Government, 1995:
"The MISUSE of Church Government
"As the Church developed, however, all of us leading ministers began to emphasize the need for UNITY. We realized that, unlike the Sardis church which kept splitting, we needed to stay together to do the Work. And that was certainly vital as long as a dedicated man of God (like Herbert W. Armstrong) was guiding a Church of God where the full Truth could be taught and preached.
"But, we unwittingly went too far. We began to compare Mr. Armstrong with Moses--a special prophet God talked with face to face. God gave Moses direct commands which often became part of the Scriptures! We confused the position of Herbert Armstrong with Moses--through whom God spoke directly and who was the supernaturally appointed leader of the ONE physical nation on earth God was directly working with.
"Many ministers began to use the example of Korah's rebellion and similar examples to imply that--if anyone ever left this Church even in hurt or confusion--they were REBELLING against the Government of God just as surely as Korah and his followers. Everything seemed to become the Government of God."
7. Isnt accepting stolen property still stealing?
RCM Dec. 21st letter
"I did NOT "steal" the mailing list."
"However, some of my loyal friends had been--absolutely unknown to me- -quietly accumulating names. So we did NOT [u]se the corporate mailing list for my original letter or any letter since, although I should have been allowed to!"
[My note: If you still have the envelope of that Nov. 21st letter, you'll notice the PIN number by your name. This is a clear indication of the "corporate" mailing list. Just because it wasn't the entire list doesn't mean it's not corporate property.]
8. Who directs the Church -- RCM or the Council?
RCM - Letter to The Journal, Oct. 30, 1998:
"First, let me say that our practices are best enunciated in my
"member letter" of June 11, 1998, which you kindly ran as a guest
editorial in a recent issue...
"The bylaws of the Global Church of God, which clearly govern our administrative processes, clearly state that the council of elders has final authority in the church in all major doctrinal as well as administrative matters. The board of directors is charged with conducting the business of the church, including hiring or terminating personnel, establishing their duties and setting their compensation. While both the board and the council have confirmed my leading role in the church, all final decisions are made by consensus -- usually after much discussion and prayers."
RCM
- June 11th letter:
"From the outset, brethren, we informed God's people in Global that
the form of government we use would not involve rule by ONE MAN...[In the
NT], it was a collective sort of leadership. The responsibility for directing
the Church was NOT then invested in a SOLE individual on earth. The decision
was clearly through 'multitude of counsel'...Peter...NEVER unilaterally
decided ANY of those basic matters in the New Testament Church...
"In our recent Council meetings, we have clarified and reaffirmed that the Global Church of God will continue to be lead by a tried and tested group of Spirit-led men-the Council of Elders.
"So you see, brethren, it is the Council of Elders and the Board of Directors that make all major decisions for the Church..."
RCM - Aug.
13th PC letter:
"These most recent "changes" are better described as
"clarifications." When the Council of Elders was formed in 1995, it
was desired that the Council and the Board assume the oversight of doctrinal
and major administrative matters, pertaining to the overall goals and mission
of the Work. The approach to this kind of government within the Church-rather
than an autocratic rule through just one-man without any checks and balances-
was clearly communicated to tens of thousands of people through our
Church government booklet. Most people who joined Global, and who
had read our booklet, clearly understood this approach and agreed with
it."
"Let me also assure you that I do agree "100% with the contents of the [June 11th] letter."
"But this does not mean that I did not agree with the contents of the [June 11th] letter; otherwise, I would not have signed the same."
RCM Tulsa Sermon - Aug. 1, 1998:
"... The Council is the top hierarchy in spiritual issues."
"The hierarchy is the Council of Elders..."
"The Board makes the decisions."
RCM - Nov. 27th letter:
When I established the Council of Elders, it was supposed to be the HIGHEST
body to deal with both the spiritual and administrative direction of the
Church.
RCM Tulsa Sermon - Aug. 1, 1998:
"I brought other ministers (peers of mine) into Global. I put them into
office. I have appointed every single one of them to the Board or the Council
of Elders. I appointed Council Members myself, unilaterally.... I am in charge
in that sense....I appointed all the Board Members....How many Board Members
were voted into office by someone else ? Zero. How many Council Members were
voted into office by someone else ? Zero! I appointed them all. Just like
Moses did....I have known them for decades. Otherwise, I would not have
appointed them.... I appointed all of them [Council Members]. I appointed
every one of them."
Minutes of
a Council meeting:
"The Council then discussed a sermon given in Tulsa by Dr. Meredith,
during which Dr. Meredith attempted to quiet concerns by some regarding the
government issue, and although this attempt was quite successful, it was felt
that some of the statements in the sermon did not accurately reflect the
government structure, as set forth in the Bylaws, as mentioned in Dr.
Meredith's June 11, 1998 letter to the brethren, and agreed by the Council and
the Board. Dr. Meredith stated that he did use too strong terms in his
sermon, and said he agrees with what was told the public in his June 11, 1998,
letter. Further, that the decisions of the Board and Council are final,
with the proviso that Dr. Meredith will act as a strong leader, but not as the
sole leader.
"During a lengthy discussion, the Council unanimously upheld and confirmed... the fact that the Council and the Board make decisions, as set forth in the Bylaws, that those decisions are reached by open discussion until there is a consensus, and that an issue should not be tabled, after it has been discussed and decided by the Council/and or the Board."
July
27th Legal Document on Government in the Church
"The Minutes, dated March 15, 1994, even state that "Donald [E.] Davis
moved that the Corporate Minutes from all previous meetings of the Board of
Directors were approved with one correction: In point 5 of the June 17, 1993
Minutes, the word 'nominated' was substituted for the word 'appointed.'"
This motion was seconded by Mr. Pope and approved unanimously by the
Board.
"This correction is telling: The June 17, 1993 Minutes had stated originally that "Roderick C. Meredith appointed J.Edwin Pope as Chief Financial Officer." The correction to "nominated" shows that the Board understood that it is the Board's authority, in accordance with the Bylaws, to appoint and remove Officers and Directors of the Board."
9. Did RCM know what the By-laws said or not?
RCM - Nov. 21st letter
"You might ask how could they do all of this? It all goes back to a
serious, though innocent, mistake I made at the founding of Global. We had to
have an outside attorney draw up the By-Laws governing the Church so that we
could operate legally...."
"Those By-Laws contained the expression that "the Board" was to make all decisions regarding hiring, firing and the other administrative and business affairs of the corporation. Frankly, brethren, in the midst of hectic day and night telephone calls from many of you who came early on, with the need to get new booklets out, get our radio program going, etc., I was so busy that I didnt realize the danger of the way those By-Laws were worded."
RCM - Aug. 13th PC letter:
When the Council of Elders was formed in 1995, it was desired that the Council
and the Board assume the oversight of doctrinal and major administrative
matters, pertaining to the overall goals and mission of the Work.
RCM - June 11th letter:
"From the outset, brethren, we informed God's people in Global
that the form of government we use would not involve rule by ONE MAN...[In
the NT], it was a collective sort of leadership. The responsibility for
directing the Church was NOT then invested in a SOLE individual on earth. The
decision was clearly through 'multitude of counsel'...Peter...NEVER
unilaterally decided ANY of those basic matters in the New
Testament Church...
July 27th Legal Document on Government in the Church
On or about May 8, 1995, the Board adopted unanimously a new set of Bylaws,
which included the establishment of a Council of Elders. The Minutes state
this: "By-Laws for...the Global Church of God...were rewritten by Mr.
Carl McNair and Mr. Pope, with the help of Global's attorney, Mr. Adams. This
was done to more clearly reflect the purpose of the Work and the way [this
organization is] operating. The By-laws, as re-written, had been
reviewed prior to the meeting by all members of the Board. After a general
discussion of the By-laws, they were approved, unanimously, by the
board."
[My note: Even if RCM didnt realize the "danger" of the wording in 1993, he surely could have changed the by-laws in 1995 (while his wife and Don Davis were still on the board and before the council was formed). His statements clearly indicate he knew how he set it up in 1993.]
Brian M. Hoselton